Club Penguin Fanon Wiki talk:Administrators

We should really update the list of admins. Nicktang10 Happy Chinese New Year! 00:49, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Yes. --Nat Toes 04:19, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Ninj's activity

Concerned about Ninj's activity. Has only made two (minor) edits since this June. --Penstubal ^{(Talk) (Edits)} 14:04, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Ninj as in Ninjinian? Special:Contributions/Ninjinian. I knew that was wrong before I even looked at his contributions. CK^{Sysop/BOBmaster?} 14:44, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

nvm i looked into his user page not his contributions, keep up good work NJN --Penstubal ^{(Talk) (Edits)} 14:47, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

CK and EDFan

This assertion that CK and EDFan are somehow active while ARB is /completely inactive/ is completely dishonest, blatantly false, extremely unfair and frankly, very corrupt. CK and EDFan are in the same basket as ARB and are by no means active, and barely even qualify for partially active these days. Personal biases and opinions one might have against certain users should not influence a list that should serve to tell users which administrators are more active and are not more active. --Penstubal ^{(Talk) (Edits)} 14:18, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

ARB has made one edit since September 1st and not been on IRC at all, while I check the wiki every day and edit multiple times a week. Ed and I are also on the IRC pretty much every day. It has nothing to do with personal bias. --CK^Admin 15:50, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

I was going to give my thoughts on this but CK already said basically everything that needed to be said, tbh. Maybe check recent contributions first before making claims like this. --Chill57181 ^{(Talk • Contributions)} 16:47, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

I wasn't saying about ARB herself and whether she is or is not active. I was talking about CK and EDFan, who somehow do qualify as fully active, when they don't, neither on their own merit, NOR in comparison with ARB. They should both at least be downgraded to partially active. --Penstubal ^{(Talk) (Edits)} 17:20, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

While their edits may not appear to be frequent on Recent Changes, I would like to point out that their activity levels on the Wiki are roughly proportional to the Wiki’s own overall activity. Besides that, they are also on the IRC channel every day. While the Inactivity policy did state that “simply being on IRC is not enough to be considered active”, EDFan and CK do contribute towards any recent discussion about the Wiki that takes place on IRC if they happen to be online. Since they’ve been on IRC for almost every day I myself am online, I would consider them to be accessible if I need any help. Because of that, I do not think they should have their activity level changed at all. --SlenderXP Talk to me 18:11, 27 November 2019 (UTC)